Difference between revisions of "Talk:Farlax Sector"
(Created page with "I've just remembered that there was another article for this: Farlax. Should consider merging this into the first article and turning this into a redirect. Or vice versa. The...") |
Qatar Shendo (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've just remembered that there was another article for this: [[Farlax]]. Should consider merging this into the first article and turning this into a redirect. Or vice versa. The naming convention that is used most at the moment is either '{name of astrographic entity}' or '{name of astrographic entity} (type of astrographic entity)' if there are multiple of the same name. For example, Alderaan is separated into [[Alderaan (Sector)]] and [[Alderaan (Planet)]] (serving as a redirect to [[Alderaan]]). --[[User:Raith Starlight|Raith Starlight]] 18:05, 15 September 2012 (GMT) | I've just remembered that there was another article for this: [[Farlax]]. Should consider merging this into the first article and turning this into a redirect. Or vice versa. The naming convention that is used most at the moment is either '{name of astrographic entity}' or '{name of astrographic entity} (type of astrographic entity)' if there are multiple of the same name. For example, Alderaan is separated into [[Alderaan (Sector)]] and [[Alderaan (Planet)]] (serving as a redirect to [[Alderaan]]). --[[User:Raith Starlight|Raith Starlight]] 18:05, 15 September 2012 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Two things, firstly: I think all astrographic pages should be named in the sense of <nowiki>[[Name of Entity (Type)]]</nowiki> if there are two of the same name and the <nowiki>[[Name of Entity]]</nowiki> should just be a [[:Template:Disambig|Disambig]] page and I have moved Alderaan and Farlax accordingly. Secondly: Why do you use the past form in the pages, so "Farlax was a sector located in the Core Worlds region of the galaxy." ? Farlax IS a sector! Or has there been a decision to do it this way for some reason (gal change etc.)? [[User:Qatar Shendo|--Qatar Shendo]] 21:47, 15 September 2012 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 16:47, 15 September 2012
I've just remembered that there was another article for this: Farlax. Should consider merging this into the first article and turning this into a redirect. Or vice versa. The naming convention that is used most at the moment is either '{name of astrographic entity}' or '{name of astrographic entity} (type of astrographic entity)' if there are multiple of the same name. For example, Alderaan is separated into Alderaan (Sector) and Alderaan (Planet) (serving as a redirect to Alderaan). --Raith Starlight 18:05, 15 September 2012 (GMT)
- Two things, firstly: I think all astrographic pages should be named in the sense of [[Name of Entity (Type)]] if there are two of the same name and the [[Name of Entity]] should just be a Disambig page and I have moved Alderaan and Farlax accordingly. Secondly: Why do you use the past form in the pages, so "Farlax was a sector located in the Core Worlds region of the galaxy." ? Farlax IS a sector! Or has there been a decision to do it this way for some reason (gal change etc.)? --Qatar Shendo 21:47, 15 September 2012 (GMT)
