Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hook Nebula (System)"

From Holocron - Star Wars Combine
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Although I appreciate the effort, I don't think that the interview should be placed on an encyclopedic page. As a primary source, the interview should be hosted on a offsite faction site or in a namespace comparable to [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikisource] and then incorporated into the article using the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Summary_style WP:Summary Style] guidelines. [[User:Qatar Shendo|--Qatar Shendo]] 20:24, 13 February 2012 (GMT)
 
Although I appreciate the effort, I don't think that the interview should be placed on an encyclopedic page. As a primary source, the interview should be hosted on a offsite faction site or in a namespace comparable to [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikisource] and then incorporated into the article using the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Summary_style WP:Summary Style] guidelines. [[User:Qatar Shendo|--Qatar Shendo]] 20:24, 13 February 2012 (GMT)
 
:There appears to be some precedence for storing "media"-related materials in [[:Category:Media]] so the interview could arguably be categorized there. --[[User:Raith Starlight|Raith Starlight]] 02:02, 14 February 2012 (GMT)
 
:There appears to be some precedence for storing "media"-related materials in [[:Category:Media]] so the interview could arguably be categorized there. --[[User:Raith Starlight|Raith Starlight]] 02:02, 14 February 2012 (GMT)
 +
::Only that that's a CATEGORY not a NAMESPACE like "Talk: " "User: " "Holocron: " etc. I don't like the sources being in the same namespace as the articles as people will get to the pages just by browsing normally (e.g. by using the "Search" function without changing the default settings you only search the article namespace and not the others) . Also, [[PlayImp]] in that Category has the same issue with the interview/part of the magazine being in the arcticle and in the main namespace. Is it even possible to create more namespaces for someone atm? [[User:Qatar Shendo|--Qatar Shendo]] 21:09, 14 February 2012 (GMT)

Revision as of 16:09, 14 February 2012

Interview

Although I appreciate the effort, I don't think that the interview should be placed on an encyclopedic page. As a primary source, the interview should be hosted on a offsite faction site or in a namespace comparable to Wikisource and then incorporated into the article using the WP:Summary Style guidelines. --Qatar Shendo 20:24, 13 February 2012 (GMT)

There appears to be some precedence for storing "media"-related materials in Category:Media so the interview could arguably be categorized there. --Raith Starlight 02:02, 14 February 2012 (GMT)
Only that that's a CATEGORY not a NAMESPACE like "Talk: " "User: " "Holocron: " etc. I don't like the sources being in the same namespace as the articles as people will get to the pages just by browsing normally (e.g. by using the "Search" function without changing the default settings you only search the article namespace and not the others) . Also, PlayImp in that Category has the same issue with the interview/part of the magazine being in the arcticle and in the main namespace. Is it even possible to create more namespaces for someone atm? --Qatar Shendo 21:09, 14 February 2012 (GMT)