Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pentastar Alignment (Year 13)"
Rupert Havok (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
More importantly, as the old Pentastar Alignment was a famous galactic government and the vast majority of existing article links on the Holocron refer to that former Pentastar Alignment, the "Pentastar Alignment" page itself should become a Disambiguation page. As such, this new group should become "Pentastar Alignment (Year 13)" and its relationship to the old Pentastar Alignment (or lack thereof) clearly delineated in the disambiguation page. -- [[User:Rupert Havok|Rupert Havok]] 06:02, 27 August 2012 (GMT) | More importantly, as the old Pentastar Alignment was a famous galactic government and the vast majority of existing article links on the Holocron refer to that former Pentastar Alignment, the "Pentastar Alignment" page itself should become a Disambiguation page. As such, this new group should become "Pentastar Alignment (Year 13)" and its relationship to the old Pentastar Alignment (or lack thereof) clearly delineated in the disambiguation page. -- [[User:Rupert Havok|Rupert Havok]] 06:02, 27 August 2012 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Agree with Rupert. [[User:Jake Azzameen|Jake Azzameen]] 10:03, 27 August 2012 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 05:03, 27 August 2012
Several thoughts
As this new faction isn't a government yet, perhaps the Infobox_Government template should not be used. Infobox_Faction template should be utilized instead?
More importantly, as the old Pentastar Alignment was a famous galactic government and the vast majority of existing article links on the Holocron refer to that former Pentastar Alignment, the "Pentastar Alignment" page itself should become a Disambiguation page. As such, this new group should become "Pentastar Alignment (Year 13)" and its relationship to the old Pentastar Alignment (or lack thereof) clearly delineated in the disambiguation page. -- Rupert Havok 06:02, 27 August 2012 (GMT)
- Agree with Rupert. Jake Azzameen 10:03, 27 August 2012 (GMT)
