Difference between revisions of "Template talk:OOC"

From Holocron - Star Wars Combine
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==wording== I've changed to indigo background for better visibility of a link text, removed explicit naming of OOC terminology and replaced it with link to Guide. However we're n...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
I've changed to indigo background for better visibility of a link text, removed explicit naming of OOC terminology and replaced it with link to Guide. However we're now linking twice to the same content...<br />
 
I've changed to indigo background for better visibility of a link text, removed explicit naming of OOC terminology and replaced it with link to Guide. However we're now linking twice to the same content...<br />
 
Also English is not my native language, but ''"not written in an in character view''" sounds somewhat strange to me. If this is correct English then disregard me, otherwise maybe changing to ''"not written from an in character perspective"'' or something similar could be considered. --[[User:Xesh Randell|Xesh Randell]] 14:13, 13 September 2012 (GMT)
 
Also English is not my native language, but ''"not written in an in character view''" sounds somewhat strange to me. If this is correct English then disregard me, otherwise maybe changing to ''"not written from an in character perspective"'' or something similar could be considered. --[[User:Xesh Randell|Xesh Randell]] 14:13, 13 September 2012 (GMT)
 +
 +
:Perspective does sound better than view! Also, this template shouldn't be used in the OOC namespace (articles like [[:OOC:Combine Commander]] anymore as it refers to rewriting the article which isn't applicable for the OOC namespace! [[User:Qatar Shendo|--Qatar Shendo]] 18:31, 13 September 2012 (GMT)

Revision as of 13:31, 13 September 2012

wording

I've changed to indigo background for better visibility of a link text, removed explicit naming of OOC terminology and replaced it with link to Guide. However we're now linking twice to the same content...
Also English is not my native language, but "not written in an in character view" sounds somewhat strange to me. If this is correct English then disregard me, otherwise maybe changing to "not written from an in character perspective" or something similar could be considered. --Xesh Randell 14:13, 13 September 2012 (GMT)

Perspective does sound better than view! Also, this template shouldn't be used in the OOC namespace (articles like OOC:Combine Commander anymore as it refers to rewriting the article which isn't applicable for the OOC namespace! --Qatar Shendo 18:31, 13 September 2012 (GMT)