Talk:Mandalorian

SWC, please!

The article is copy&paste of canon material at the moment. I would blank the page, if it weren't for the fact that we should have a "Mandalorian" article. Or is there a reason not to? Any experts out there?--Dreighton 00:45, 5 April 2013 (GMT)

Well the internet has FBI and CIA agents thats about it. Rakton Sidonus 03:25, 24 October 2013 (GMT)

Rakton, what does that have to do with anything? Mesh`la Daryc 04:55, 24 October 2013 (GMT)

This article does not need to be deleted,simply rewritten to fit SWC history as established by Orph's History of the Galaxy article. --Prard`aga Rono 23:03, 30 October 2013 (GMT)

I don't see anything that goes against that article currently. Mesh`la Daryc 23:42, 30 October 2013 (GMT)

Category?

Any suggestions on what category this article falls into? It's not exactly a race... or a species... Perhaps Category:Associations? -- Rupert Havok 22:00, 14 November 2013 (GMT)

It would be a cultural group, much like Correllians and Hapans would be if the Human races are merged into a single species, so maybe there should be a Category:Cultural Groups Mesh`la Daryc 01:13, 16 November 2013 (GMT)

I agree that it is 100% a cultural group. There was the ancient race of Mandalorians, the Taung, but they're long extint. Our Mandos are all a cultural thing. Though the holo page could reference the race (as it's pre-SWC timeline) the group should be cultural. -- Kyran Caelius 05:41, 16 November 2013 (GMT)

All right... so a Category:Cultures then? That seems to be also how Wookieepedia handles it. -- Rupert Havok 19:18, 19 November 2013 (GMT)

Known Mandalorians?

I think that the Known Mandalorians section should be updated to "Notable Mandalorians" -- Prard`aga Rono 06:22, 13 October 2014 (GMT)

I agree. -- Rupert Havok 20:09, 13 October 2014 (GMT)

Why. Most of those people aren't remotely notable. There isn't reason for such a listing at all when the category link is already right there, so unless you want to massively condense the list into the few Mandalorians that actually are notable (which are already mentioned in previous sections and on the rest of the page), there's no point. Including the section at all is sloppy and redundant due to the existence of the category. --Syn 05:19, 14 October 2014 (GMT)

Agreed with Syn. Being known hardly makes you notable. --Fures Nocti 05:34, 14 October 2014 (GMT)

Yes my intention was to focus on mMndalorians that are only notable, rather than everyone ho identifies as a Mando. -- Prard`aga Rono 06:22, 14 October 2014 (GMT)

Would anyone be opposed to deleting the section entirely and adding the Category: Mandalorians link to a "See Also" section? Mesh`la Daryc (talk) 02:11, 7 June 2018 (CDT)

Sounds like a good idea. The embedded list does seem to be redundant in light of the Category existing. -- Rupert Havok (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2018 (CDT)

Well I went and did it, as long as someone agrees with me I'm sure it's all good. Mesh`la Daryc (talk) 13:59, 7 June 2018 (CDT)

NPOV?

I would really like to get the NPOV tag removed for this page, anyone have ideas how to do so? Mesh`la Daryc (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2018 (CDT)

Anyone can remove it at any time, but you'd likely have to re-write the history that regularly calls DeMeer an usurper since that is the Mando`ade viewpoint and Mandalore obviously sees things differently. Tomas o`Cuinn (talk) 20:37, 7 June 2018 (CDT)

For the record, my question is more intended on ideas for rewriting the modern times section to tell a more neutral story. Mesh`la Daryc (talk) 20:40, 7 June 2018 (CDT)