Template talk:OOC

wording

I've changed to indigo background for better visibility of a link text, removed explicit naming of OOC terminology and replaced it with link to Guide. However we're now linking twice to the same content...
Also English is not my native language, but "not written in an in character view" sounds somewhat strange to me. If this is correct English then disregard me, otherwise maybe changing to "not written from an in character perspective" or something similar could be considered. --Xesh Randell 14:13, 13 September 2012 (GMT)

Perspective does sound better than view! Also, this template shouldn't be used in the OOC namespace (articles like OOC:Combine Commander anymore as it refers to rewriting the article which isn't applicable for the OOC namespace! --Qatar Shendo 18:31, 13 September 2012 (GMT)

hmm

Why was this page blanked? -- Rupert Havok

I have no idea. When I saw it was blanked I thought something new was going to be implemented, but one day has passed with no replacement. I'm for restoring the page. --Ruben Wan 02:22, 4 June 2014 (GMT)

Template restored. Since it wasn't properly suggested for deletion and no reason for blanking was provided, while the template is still in use, I see no reason for prolonged discussion. I assume Jaydon was rewriting/working on Aliit Ky'bris and wanted to get rid of warning message there. This however is not the right way to do it. --Xesh Randell 18:26, 5 June 2014 (GMT)