Talk:Holy Atrivis Empire: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Government should indeed be restricted for factions of that type. Replaced the box with group info box. As Holy Atrivis Empire is not a faction, it can also not have any nationalized factions.--[[User:Dreighton|Dreighton]] 21:22, 20 October 2011 (GMT) | :Government should indeed be restricted for factions of that type. Replaced the box with group info box. As Holy Atrivis Empire is not a faction, it can also not have any nationalized factions.--[[User:Dreighton|Dreighton]] 21:22, 20 October 2011 (GMT) | ||
Were creating this as a security faction, but UNB and SGW is owned by me. | Were creating this as a security faction, but UNB and SGW is owned by me.--Solarius | ||
:That explains some of it, but this still doesn't make them nationalized factions of the Holy Atrivis Empire.--[[User:Dreighton|Dreighton]] 21:00, 30 October 2011 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:00, 30 October 2011
This is listed as active, but at least one member, Universal Network Bank, is listed elsewhere as an official member of the Confederacy of Independent Systems[1]. I'd also suggest treating it as an alliance rather than a government. -James Ortell Donovan 16:19, 12 October 2011 (GMT)
- Government should indeed be restricted for factions of that type. Replaced the box with group info box. As Holy Atrivis Empire is not a faction, it can also not have any nationalized factions.--Dreighton 21:22, 20 October 2011 (GMT)
Were creating this as a security faction, but UNB and SGW is owned by me.--Solarius
- That explains some of it, but this still doesn't make them nationalized factions of the Holy Atrivis Empire.--Dreighton 21:00, 30 October 2011 (GMT)