Talk:Galactic Empire: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
About "The Great Break, the Imperial Core and the Dark Empire". The first paragraphs are only a bunch of lies that will need to be rewritten. I never was in favor of a split. I never liked it. [[User:Veynom|Veynom]] 15:19, 3 March 2011 (GMT) | About "The Great Break, the Imperial Core and the Dark Empire". The first paragraphs are only a bunch of lies that will need to be rewritten. I never was in favor of a split. I never liked it. [[User:Veynom|Veynom]] 15:19, 3 March 2011 (GMT) | ||
It needs a lot of fixing, indeed. The whole transition from Piett to Connel and eventually Charon is not just represented in a strange way, it is so far off that I have sometimes no idea what event the text may be talking about. Did Knyte EVER, in any way or form, jokingly or in ernest, on a board or a mail, use the first name "Adric"? Any idea where this is coming from?--[[User:Dreighton|Dreighton]] 18:19, 3 March 2011 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 18:19, 3 March 2011
I know the Empire is probably not keen on it, but should there be mention that the Empire is frequently called the Imperial Remnant by its detractors? Weylin vi Cron 13:10, 3 March 2011 (GMT)
About "The Great Break, the Imperial Core and the Dark Empire". The first paragraphs are only a bunch of lies that will need to be rewritten. I never was in favor of a split. I never liked it. Veynom 15:19, 3 March 2011 (GMT)
It needs a lot of fixing, indeed. The whole transition from Piett to Connel and eventually Charon is not just represented in a strange way, it is so far off that I have sometimes no idea what event the text may be talking about. Did Knyte EVER, in any way or form, jokingly or in ernest, on a board or a mail, use the first name "Adric"? Any idea where this is coming from?--Dreighton 18:19, 3 March 2011 (GMT)