User talk:Xanyarr Chyakk: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
EDIT: If we want to have some listing of possible ranks, it can be done, but for kriff's sake, not a separate page about every rank! - added 18:08 GMT | EDIT: If we want to have some listing of possible ranks, it can be done, but for kriff's sake, not a separate page about every rank! - added 18:08 GMT | ||
:Because it's a general rule that a first time a technical term is introduced a link to an article about it and its use by different groups of people is created. It's a wiki editing 101. --[[User:Xanyarr Chyakk|Xanyarr Chyakk]] 18:18, 1 May 2011 (GMT) | :Because it's a general rule that a first time a technical term is introduced a link to an article about it and its use by different groups of people is created. It's a wiki editing 101. --[[User:Xanyarr Chyakk|Xanyarr Chyakk]] 18:18, 1 May 2011 (GMT) | ||
:: So let's make the listing of possible ranks - that would be the "article about it and its use by different groups of people". I could start working on such a listing tomorrow. - Kinsa Rha, 1.05.2011, 18:44 GMT |
Revision as of 18:45, 1 May 2011
Why do we need that overabundance of red links in the article about Jessy James's retirement? I did nothing else than deleted the red links. - Kinsa Rha, 1.05.2011, 18:03 GMT EDIT: If we want to have some listing of possible ranks, it can be done, but for kriff's sake, not a separate page about every rank! - added 18:08 GMT
- Because it's a general rule that a first time a technical term is introduced a link to an article about it and its use by different groups of people is created. It's a wiki editing 101. --Xanyarr Chyakk 18:18, 1 May 2011 (GMT)
- So let's make the listing of possible ranks - that would be the "article about it and its use by different groups of people". I could start working on such a listing tomorrow. - Kinsa Rha, 1.05.2011, 18:44 GMT