Difference between revisions of "User talk:Xanyarr Chyakk"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: So let's make the listing of possible ranks - that would be the "article about it and its use by different groups of people". I could start working on such a listing tomorrow. - Kinsa Rha, 1.05.2011, 18:44 GMT | :: So let's make the listing of possible ranks - that would be the "article about it and its use by different groups of people". I could start working on such a listing tomorrow. - Kinsa Rha, 1.05.2011, 18:44 GMT | ||
| + | :::That's a good solution until the page grows too big and too cumbersome! And all the individual rank/title pages could be redirect pages to that overview page. --[[User:Xanyarr Chyakk|Xanyarr Chyakk]] 19:14, 1 May 2011 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 1 May 2011
Why do we need that overabundance of red links in the article about Jessy James's retirement? I did nothing else than deleted the red links. - Kinsa Rha, 1.05.2011, 18:03 GMT EDIT: If we want to have some listing of possible ranks, it can be done, but for kriff's sake, not a separate page about every rank! - added 18:08 GMT
- Because it's a general rule that a first time a technical term is introduced a link to an article about it and its use by different groups of people is created. It's a wiki editing 101. --Xanyarr Chyakk 18:18, 1 May 2011 (GMT)
- So let's make the listing of possible ranks - that would be the "article about it and its use by different groups of people". I could start working on such a listing tomorrow. - Kinsa Rha, 1.05.2011, 18:44 GMT
- That's a good solution until the page grows too big and too cumbersome! And all the individual rank/title pages could be redirect pages to that overview page. --Xanyarr Chyakk 19:14, 1 May 2011 (GMT)
- So let's make the listing of possible ranks - that would be the "article about it and its use by different groups of people". I could start working on such a listing tomorrow. - Kinsa Rha, 1.05.2011, 18:44 GMT
